6-Week Exam Essay Questions (Rev 1)
1. How did the Constitution strike a balance
between a strong national government and states’ rights? Has that balance shifted too far in favor of
the federal government, or have the states maintained their proportionate
sovereignty? Explain.
A.
Constitution
1.
Enumerated
powers – limits what the national government can do
2.
Article
V – any changes to the constitution has to be ratified by the states
3.
Article
IV, VI
4.
Amendment
17 – direct election of senators
5.
Supremacy
Clause; Necessary and Proper Clause
B.
Federalism
1.
Dual
Federalism – feds can’t exceed enumerated powers
2.
Cooperative
Federalism – pro-national power; New Deal (social programs)
3.
Creative
Federalism – pro-national power; funds local programs
4.
New
Federalism – Reagan; cuts social programs
C.
Supreme
Court
Expansion of Federal Power: Expansion/Protection
of State Power:
1.
McCulloch
v.
2.
Gibbons
v.
D.
Patriot
Act
1.
Allows
INS to detain illegal immigrants indefinitely
2.
Denies
right to free speech by taping terrorists with their lawyers
3.
Roving
wire taps
2. Discuss the role the Supreme Court has played
in the drive for the abolition of slavery and civil rights for African
Americans. Examining that role, does the
Supreme Court wield too much power, allowing it to overrule the democratic
process? Explain.
A.
Applicable
Cases
1.
Dredd
Scott v. Sansford – taken to free state and returned; sued for freedom
2.
Civil
Rights Cases of 1883 – private discrimination is allowed
3.
Plessy
v.
4.
Brown
v. Board of Education – equal protection; deliberate speed to desegregation
B.
Power
(somewhat of an opinion) – no, it is providing the check and balance it is
intended to provide
3. Discuss the danger of factions in government,
and how the Framers sought to minimize it.
Did the Framers achieve their goals?
Give examples of how they did or did not.
A. The Federalist
#10 (
1. Factions arise
due to property dispersion
2. Only get rid of
factions by destroying them or making everyone the same
3. Can’t destroy, so
try to control with a Representative government
a. Controls passion,
encourages each to see the big picture
b. So no factions
get too large
4. What were the weaknesses of the Articles of
Confederation. How did the Framers address
these weaknesses and balance the interests of the various states in order to
arrive at a constitution which was acceptable to all?
A. Articles of
Confederation weaknesses
1. Unable to levy
taxes
2. Unable to
regulate trade (interstate commerce)
3. Needed 9 states
to pass any measures or take any action
4. Could not fund
anything, even the Army
B. Balancing state
interests in the Constitution
1. State Interests
a. Southern
Interests that were written in
· 3/5 Compromise
· 20 Year
Compromise
· Slavery is a
state issue
b. National powers
enumerated; all other powers are reserved to the states
2. National Power – Levy
taxes, regulate trade, supreme power
5. Compare and contrast the Gay Rights movement with
the efforts of African Americans to achieve equal rights. What methods has each group used to achieve
its goals? Has the system worked as
intended by the Framers? Explain.
A. African American
effort
1. Gained support
and groups formed to lobby Congress – passed Civil Rights Act of 1964, Civil
Rights Cases of 1883, Plessy, Brown
B. Gay Rights
1. Limited success
in court (HIV discrimination, insurance, and some employment issues decided in
their favor)
2. President Clinton
championed their right to be gay and in the military (compromised with
Congress)
3. 1986 Powers v.
Hardwick – upheld law’s ban on sodomy
C. Both had trouble
getting civil rights through the Supreme Court initially
D. General
1. Courts to
challenge minority issues
2. Legislation to
attack the issue once it is more debatable
6. Examine the influence of Hobbes and Locke on
the Framers. How is their influence
reflected in the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the
writings of Madison and Jefferson? Were
they more influenced more by one or the other?
Explain.
7. In what ways has the government expanded its
power in the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks? Are such expansions warranted, or has the
government gone beyond its Constitutional limitations? Explain.
A. Patriot Act
1. Allows INS to
detain illegal immigrants indefinitely
2. Denies right to
free speech by taping terrorists with their lawyers
3. Roving wire taps
4. “Unlawful combatants”
not POWs
B. Military Tribunals
8. How is the right to “privacy” protected by
the Bill of Rights if the word itself does not appear in that document? Examine modern examples of actions which are
or are not protected under the right to privacy.
A. Privacy
1. 4th
Amendment – grants the right to be “secure in their persons, houses …” which is
an aspect of privacy
2. Also, 9th
Amendment says the people are not
restricted to the rights enumerated by the Constitution
B. Modern actions
not protected under right to privacy
1. Right to die
2. (formerly
abortion, though now legal)
3. Homosexuality